Top Vendors

Exam Simulator Price Table 000-267 Vendors Entry Tests
IT Service Vendors About Us Exam Simulator Price Table
000-267 Vendors Entry Tests IT Service Vendors
About Us Exam Simulator Price Table 000-267 Exam Simulator

000-267 AS/400 RPG IV Developer

Study Guide Prepared by Killexams.com IBM Dumps Experts


Killexams.com 000-267 Dumps and Real Questions 2019

Latest and 100% real exam Questions - Memorize Questions and Answers - Guaranteed Success in exam



000-267 exam Dumps Source : AS/400 RPG IV Developer

Test Code : 000-267
Test Name : AS/400 RPG IV Developer
Vendor Name : IBM
Q&A : 121 Real Questions

in which am i able to discover 000-267 dumps questions?
My view of the 000-267 test price guide was negative as I always wanted to have the preparation by a test method in a class room and for that I joined two different classes but those all seemed a fake thing for me and I quit them immediately. Then I did the search and ultimately changed my thinking about the 000-267 test samples and I started with the same from killexams. It really gave me the good scores in the exam and I am happy to have that.


I need actual test questions of 000-267 exam.
000-267 is the hardest exam i have ever come upon. I spent months analyzing for it, with all professional resources and the whole thing one ought to find - and failed it miserably. however I didnt give up! a few months later, I delivered killexams.com to my training agenda and kept working towards on the exam simulator and the real exam questions they provide. I believe that is precisely what helped me skip the second time round! I wish I hadnt wasted the time and moneyon all this needless stuff (their books arent horrific in trendy, but I believe they dont come up with the great examtraining).


That was Awesome! I got real exam questions of 000-267 exam.
It have been years and i was stuck on the equal designation, it turned into like being glued to the chair with fevicol. to begin with you think, simply wait precise matters come in time. however then your persistence wears off and you realizeyou gotta take a stand earlier than its too past due. on the grounds that my work entails in general coping with a 000-267 consumers base I decided to ace it and come to be the he is aware of all about 000-267 dude in the office. Upon a palssteerage I attempted your 000-267 demo from killexams.com, cherished and it and moved onto a purchase. Your testengine is excellent and nowadays your observe kit has made me the brand new 000-267 manager.


truly use these actual query bank and success is yours.
I recognize the struggles made in growing the exam simulator. its far superb. i passed my 000-267 exam especially with questions and answers supplied with the aid of killexams.com crew


i am very happy with this 000-267 study manual.
I without a doubt purchased this 000-267 braindump, as soon as I heard that killexams.com has the updates. Its right, they have got gotblanketed all new areas, and the exam looks very clean. Given the latest replace, their turn around time and manual is terrific.


take into account it or not, clearly attempt as quickly as!
Surpassed the 000-267 exam with 99% marks. Super! Considering simplest 15 days steering time. All credit marks is going to the query & answer by way of manner of killexams. Its high-quality dump made training so clean that I ought toeven recognize the hard subjects secure. Thanks loads, killexams.com for offering us such an clean and effective observeguide. Want your crew keep on developing greater of such courses for different IT certification test.


attempt out those actual 000-267 real take a look at questions.
This killexams.com from helped me get my 000-267 companion confirmation. Their material are truly beneficial, and the exam simulator is clearly notable, it completely reproduces the exam. subjects are clean very without problems using the killexams.com observe dump. The exam itself changed into unpredictable, so Im happy I utilized killexams.com Q&A. Their packs spread all that I need, and that i wont get any unsavory shocks amid your exam. Thanx guys.


I need real test questions modern-day 000-267 examination.
I even have become a 000-267 certified final week. This profession direction may be very thrilling, so in case you are nonethelessconsidering it, ensure you get questions solutions to put together the 000-267 exam. This is a big time saver as you get precisely what you need to recognise for the 000-267 exam. This is why I selected it, and that i never appeared lower back.


Feeling trouble in passing 000-267 exam? you bought to be kidding!
killexams.com supplied me with legitimate exam questions and answers. Everything turned into correct and real, so I had no trouble passing this exam, even though I didnt spend that a whole lot time analyzing. Even if you have a completely simple know-how of 000-267 exam and services, you could pull it off with this package. I was a touch pressured in basic terms due to the big quantity of information, however as I saved going thru the questions, matters started out falling into area, and my confusion disappeared. All in all, I had a awesome experience with killexams.com, and hope that so will you.


Take benefit of 000-267 dumps, Use these questions to ensure your achievement.
Hurrah! I have passed my 000-267 this week. And I got flying color and for all this I am so thankful to killexams. They have come up with so fabulous and well-engineered program. Their simulations are very much like the ones in real exams. Simulations are the main aspect of 000-267 exam and worth more weight age then other questions. After preparing from their program it was very easy for me to solve all those simulations. I used them for all 000-267 exam and found them trustful every time.


IBM AS/400 RPG IV Developer

Settling In With IBM i For The lengthy Haul | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

February eleven, 2019 Timothy Prickett Morgan

If nothing else, the IBM i platform has exhibited surprising longevity. One could even say legendary durability, in case you want to take its history all of the way back to the gadget/3 minicomputer from 1969. this is the actual beginning point in the AS/four hundred family unit tree and here is when large Blue, for terribly sound legal and technical and advertising and marketing causes, decided to fork its products to tackle the pleasing needs of enormous agencies (with the system/360 mainframe and its observe-ons) and small and medium groups (starting with the gadget/3 and relocating on through the equipment/34, system/32, device/38, and equipment/36 in the Seventies and early Eighties and passing throughout the AS/400, AS/400e, iSeries, device i, and then IBM i on vigor methods platforms.

It has been an extended run indeed, and many customers who've invested within the platform began manner back then and there with the early versions of RPG and moved their purposes ahead and altered them as their businesses evolved and the depth and breadth of company computing changed, moving on up through RPG II, RPG III, RPG IV, ILE RPG, and now RPG free form. Being on this platform for even three a long time makes you a relative newcomer.

there is an extended run forward, for the reason that we agree with that the groups which are nonetheless working IBM i techniques are the real diehards, the ones who don't have any intention of leaving the platform and that, at least in accordance with the survey data we now have been privy too, are aspiring to continue investing in, or even expand their investments in, the IBM i platform.

so far, we are not in a recession and heaven inclined there aren't one, so the priorities that IBM i retail outlets have don't seem to be the ones that they'd a decade in the past all over the peak of the terrific Recession. again then, as become the case in practically all IT businesses, IBM i retail outlets were hunkering down and have been trying to cut costs in all methods viable, including deferring device upgrades and migrations in addition to slicing lower back on other tasks. simplest 29 % of the 750 IBM i retail outlets that participated within the 2019 IBM i marketplace Survey, which HelpSystems did lower back in October 2018, have been involved about reducing IT spending. this is a remarkably low degree, and that i think is indicative of how pretty robust the economic system is – excepting one of the suits and starts we noticed on the end of 2018 and right here in early 2019 that make us nervous and will beginning putting pressure on issues. listed here are the properly concerns as culled from the survey:

dealing with the boom in facts and in deciding the analytics to bite on that information ranked a bit bit higher on the 2019 IBM i industry Survey than did reducing charges, and i believe over the lengthy haul these considerations will turn into more important than modernizing applications and dealing with the IBM i expertise shortages which are a perennial be concerned. both of these considerations are being solved as new programmers and new equipment to make new interfaces to database purposes have become greater common and as applied sciences similar to free form RPG, which appears greater like Java, Python, and Hypertext Preprocessor, are being greater broadly deployed and, importantly, can also be picked up greater rapidly with the aid of programmers experienced with these different languages.

Given the character of the consumer base, it appears not going to me that security and excessive availability will no longer continue to be fundamental considerations, however that the IBM i platform is among the most relaxed structures on the earth (and never just because it is obscure, but because it is exceedingly problematic to hack) and it has a number of high availability and catastrophe recovery tools (from IBM, Syncsort, Maxava, and HelpSystems) accessible for those that want to double up their techniques and give protection to their applications and statistics. The bar is commonly larger than primary backup and recuperation for many IBM i shops in the banking, insurance, manufacturing, and distribution industries that dominate the platform. These companies can’t have protection breaches, and that they can’t have downtime.

there's a outstanding amount of steadiness within the IBM i consumer base that we believe, at this element, is reflective in the steadiness of the IBM i platform and large Blue’s personal perception that it needs a match IBM i platform to have an universal fit vigour techniques enterprise. all of us know that the energy techniques hardware company has simply became in 5 quarters of profits boom – whatever thing we discussed currently in constructing our own income model for the vigor methods company – but what we didn't recognize, and what you'll want to understand, is that in the 2nd and third quarters of 2018, the IBM i element of the company grew tremendously quicker than the usual power techniques business, and the best reason that this did not occur within the closing quarter of 2018 is that income of IBM i equipment in this autumn 2017 became fairly effective and represented a very hard examine. The aspect is, the IBM i enterprise has been elevating the energy techniques class normal. (These guidelines about the IBM i company come compliments of Steve Sibley, vice chairman and providing supervisor of Cognitive systems at IBM.)

IBM’s personal monetary balance of the power platform – which has been bolstered by way of a movement into Linux clusters for analytics and excessive performance computing simulation and modeling in addition to with the aid of the adoption of the HANA in-reminiscence database through SAP purchasers on large iron machines together with Power8 and now Power9 techniques – helps IBM i customers feel extra confident in investing in the latest IBM i platform. The recent proof from a number of different surveys, not just the one completed by way of HelpSystems each year, suggests that agencies are by way of and big either carrying on with to make investments within the platform and even in some circumstances are planning to increase their spending on the IBM i platform in 2019.

As you can see, the sample of investment plans for the IBM i platform, as proven within the chart above, has now not modified very tons at all in the past four years. it's a remarkably solid pattern with but a bit wiggling right here and there that may additionally no longer even be statistically tremendous. simply beneath 1 / 4 of IBM i stores have mentioned during the past 4 years that they plan to boost their investment in the platform in each and every yr, and just under half say that they're keeping constant. This doesn't imply that the equal companies, year after year, are investing more and different agencies are staying pat, year after yr. it is far more probably that every handful of years – greater like four or five – customers improve their programs and expand their capacity, and they then take a seat tight. The wonder is that the split isn’t showing some distance fewer organizations investing and much extra sitting tight. That greater than a tenth of the stores don’t be aware of what their plan is as every prior yr comes to an in depth is just a little stressful, nevertheless it is sincere and indicates that a good portion of retailers have other priorities aside from hardware and operating equipment enhancements. we now have spoke of this earlier than and we are able to say it once more: We think that the people who respond to surveys and read weekly publications focused on the IBM i platform are the most active retail outlets – the ones more prone to stay extraordinarily present on hardware and utility. So the tempo of adoption for brand new applied sciences, and the rate of funding, should be larger than in the specific base, lots of which doesn't exchange a great deal in any respect.

So if we needed to adjust this records to take on the total base, there might be some distance fewer websites which are investing extra money, far more businesses that are sitting tight, and perhaps fewer sites that are deliberating moving off the IBM i platform. I feel the distribution of facts is doubtless whatever thing like 10 percent of outlets haven't any concept what they're doing investment shrewd with IBM this 12 months, 5 % are brooding about moving some or all of their purposes to one other platform, probably 10 percent are investing greater this 12 months, and the ultimate 75 p.c are sitting tight. this is only a bet, of route. as far as we will inform, the rate of attrition – how many websites we basically lose each and every 12 months – only a tad over 1 p.c. So the rate of movement of functions off the platform, or incidences of unplugging IBM i databases and applications, might also no longer be anyplace close as high in the common base because the facts above suggests. what is alarming, perhaps, is that the price of relocating some or all applications off the platform is balanced against folks that say they're going to enhance investments. possibly these are hopeful survey takers, and people who feel it's easy to movement locate it isn't and those that think they will find the funds to invest will not.

What we do recognize is that if the cost of utility attrition was anywhere near as high as these surveys imply, then the IBM i enterprise would no longer be growing to be, however shrinking. And we are aware of it is not shrinking, so we consider there is a disconnect between planning and reality, each on the upside and the draw back.

in case you drill down into the data for the 2019 IBM i industry Survey, there were 13 percent of retailers that said they might be moving some purposes to a new platform, and a further 9 p.c that spoke of they had been going to movement all of their applications off IBM i. (This quantity is consistent with the fresh ALL400s survey performed through John Rockwell.)

Anyway, good luck with that.

Porting applications from one platform to one more, of purchasing a brand new suite on that new platform, is an exceptionally difficult project. It is not like making an attempt to exchange a tire while using down the highway, as is a typical metaphor, but quite like making an attempt to take the tire off one motor vehicle relocating down the highway and installing it on another automobile riding beside it within the adjacent lane without crashing both motor vehicle or smashing into anybody else on the road. Optimism abounds, but when push comes to shove, very few companies try this type of maneuver, and when they do, it is constantly as a result of there's a corporate mandate, greater times than not brought about via a merger or acquisition, that pits another platform towards IBM i running on vigor methods. companies that say they're making any such movement off IBM i are sanguine for their own very own motives, most likely, but they don't seem to be always realistic about how long it may take, what disruption it's going to cost, and what most effective advantage, if any, could be realized.

if you do the mathematics on the chart above, eight-tenths of the base has no theory how long a circulate will take, yet another 1.7 percent thinks it'll take greater than five years, and 3 percent say it will take between two years and 5 years. handiest three.four % of the full base say they could do it in beneath two years. We suppose all of those numbers are positive, and the companies who could with no trouble leave OS/four hundred and IBM i already did a very long time ago and those which are remain have a harder time, no longer an easier time, moving. If this had been now not proper, the IBM i base can be a hell of a lot smaller than the 120,000 clients we believe are available, in line with what massive Blue has instructed us in the past. here is the difference between fear or drive or subculture and the truth of attempting to stream a company off one platform and onto a different. These strikes are all the time a great deal tougher than they appear on the entrance conclusion, and we suspect lots of the merits additionally don’t materialize for those who do start platforms.

on the standard attrition expense cautioned through this survey statistics – 9 p.c circulate off the platform in somewhere between three hundred and sixty five days and more than five years, with most organizations no longer being able to see greater than 5 years into the longer term it truly is a neat trick – the put in base would shrink dramatically. it's difficult to claim how a long way on account of the big selection of timeframes within the survey. If it was 9 p.c of the base within two years – name it 4.5 p.c of the base per yr – then within a decade the general base would reduce from one hundred twenty,000 IBM i websites worldwide down to about 72,000. this would dramatic indeed. however at a 1 p.c attrition expense per 12 months, the bottom remains at 107,500 entertaining customers (no longer websites and not put in machines, both of which are larger) by means of 2029. We feel there's each opportunity that the attrition rate will definitely slow and drop beneath 1 % as IBM demonstrates commitment to the vigor techniques platform and its IBM i operating device. There are at all times some new purchasers being delivered in new markets, to make sure, however the bleed price (besides the fact that it's small) remains likely an order of magnitude larger than the feed cost.

when they do feel about making the move, IBM i shops know precisely where they wish to go, and this answer has been regularly altering through the years: Linux as an alternative choice to IBM i is on the upward push and home windows Server as an alternative is on the wane. in the latest survey, 52 % of the businesses that mentioned they had been relocating all or a few of their purposes to an extra platform stated they had been deciding upon windows Server, while 34 % selected Linux. This reflects the relative popularity of windows Server and Linux in the datacenters of the realm at massive, and may be tipped just a little more closely towards Linux in comparison to the rest of the world. interestingly, 10 % of those polled who stated they had been relocating were AIX platforms, and one more four % were going upscale to equipment z mainframes – as not going as this may look. platforms are inclined to roll downhill; they do not constantly defy gravity like that.

The issue about such surveys is that they show intent, no longer motion. We regularly intend to do a lot more than we really can accomplish, and relocating structures after spending many years of build up expertise is not constantly a very smart circulate except the platform is in true obstacle – just like the Itanium techniques from Hewlett Packard commercial enterprise running OpenVMS or HP-UX or the HP 3000s running MPE or the Sparc methods from Oracle working Solaris. These have been once superb systems with big put in bases and giant earnings streams, however now, IBM is the ultimate of these Unix and proprietary systems with its vigor techniques line. And it is via a ways the greatest and for sure the only 1 displaying any boom.

related studies

The IBM i Base Did certainly stream On Up

The IBM i Base Is able to flow On Up

investment And Integration warning signs For IBM i

protection still Dominates IBM i dialogue, HelpSystems’ 2018 Survey reveals

The IBM i Base not As Jumpy because it Has Been

The Feeds And Speeds Of The IBM i Base

IBM i Priorities For 2017: Pivot To protection

IBM i tendencies, issues, And Observations

IBM i Survey receives superior As Numbers grow

the place Do those IBM i Machines Work?

finding IBM i: A video game Of forty Questions

it is time to tell Us What you're as much as

IBM i industry Survey: The significance Of Being Earnest

What’s Up in the IBM i industry?

IBM i market Survey Fills within the Blanks


street to Java Goes via RPG IV | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

street to Java Goes via RPG IV

[Editor’s Note: This article is part one of a three-part series on making the transition from RPG to Java in an AS/400 shop.]

You’re committed to the AS/400 and improve applications in RPG. it works first-class for you, all the time has. but you’ve heard so a whole lot about Java being the way forward for AS/400 utility building, if now not the savior of the platform. really, nothing runs it more desirable than the AS/400. so you want to see what Java can do in your green-screen RPG applications.

You’re no longer by myself. At consumer conferences coast-to-coast, standing-room simplest crowds are packing convention rooms to discover just what Java is all about. however the transition from usual RPG to Java doesn’t ensue in a single day. IBM has outlined five phases AS/400 shops may still move through alongside the street to Java.

this article offers with part I – upgrading RPG III and CL to RPG IV and ILE CL.

Why upgrade to RPG IV? firstly, IBM is not any longer investing in RPG III. For that count number, it simplest invests in RISC versions of RPG IV. Secondly, RPG IV, accessible due to the fact the V3R1 release of OS/400 4 years in the past, is a extra up to date utility building environment.

“RPG IV is more modular,” says George Farr, VisualAge RPG and ILE RPG IV technical construction supervisor. “You don’t have monolithic purposes with lines and features of code.”

additionally, RPG IV is ILE-enabled, meaning it can be integrated with purposes written in different ILE (integrated Language environment) languages like C and COBOL . “that you could mix RPG with different languages, it combines all of the traces together,” says Farr. “You create something in RPG, C or COBOL and run it all from a single technique.”

Farr says RPG IV has similarities to Java in language facets and syntax, notwithstanding it doesn’t have any object-oriented facets like encapsulation, polymorphism and inheritance. He explains that RPG IV has structured op codes that “examine at once” to loops and “if…opt for” services in Java. records varieties used through each languages are similar.

“in case you movement straight from RPG III to Java, the getting to know curve is plenty steeper,” he says. “If it’s 50 percent going from RPG IV to Java, it’s eighty % going from RPG III to Java.” And even if you don’t intend to stream from RPG to Java, you’ll nevertheless should circulate to RPG IV to integrate Java into your device environment.

“if you’re going to have any interoperability between Java and RPG, have Java name RPG or RPG call Java, most effective RPG IV can supply that enablement,” Farr says.

“As we flow ahead, I basically don’t suppose Java will ever substitute RPG. RPG is right here to stay. although we wanted to kill it, what on the planet would we do with the hundreds of thousands of traces of RPG code which are accessible? if you believe your present applications don’t need Java, which you could go away them the style they are. but you can enable Java to confer with RPG and RPG to check with Java with RPG IV.”

The RPG tide is slowly turning toward RPG IV. Farr estimates that the percent of RPG clients on RPG IV became in the single digits in the first two years after RPG IV became released. He says it’s doubtless within the 40-50 p.c range now.

“when you stream to RPG IV, make sure to invest in cleaning up your RPG code,” he says. “With RPG IV’s op codes, that you could do things in a single line of code – like add a date/time stamp – that you would need to write traces of code for in RPG III. You stream to RPG IV, you turn them into approaches.”

So transitioning to RPG IV received’t flip RPG developers into Java developers. nonetheless it’s a vital first step. Farr cautions that the thing-oriented nature of Java will also be complex to hold close for the RPG programmer.

“Java is an object-oriented language akin to C++. It’s now not being pushed through organizations however by way of the consumer group. Java is a very dependent language. It cleans up loads of the mess of C++, with assorted inheritance, with pointers, with rubbish assortment. Java’s made it an awful lot sooner to do object-oriented programming than C++. however any OO language is going to be tough to an RPG person.

“It’ll be more convenient to gain knowledge of Java than C++. The language facets can be effortless to study, however the OO facets will be extremely difficult. it will possibly take americans a few months just to be trained what OO is all about.”

Farr says now not every RPG programmer will need to be taught Java. He suggests that most retail outlets may be combined RPG and Java. New hires is usually the Java consultants.

“I see Java as unavoidable in particular with the web. Most corporations will should tune in to it at some factor.” in case you convert your RPG III functions to RPG IV, don’t leave your CL purposes at the back of. They ought to be converted to ILE CL.

“if in case you have functions written in RPG III and you convert them to RPG IV, it’s not good ample if your CL continues to be in an OPM (usual software module) ambiance,” says Jing Wang, senior utility engineer at IBM’s Rochester, Minn. AS/four hundred building center. “RPG IV runs right into a separate ILE motion neighborhood. Sharing open data and commit manage doesn't work that well with CL. You ought to migrate CL to ILE CL and make the entire utility ILE.

“We’ve found out lots of applications do share open info. devoid of moving to ILE CL, that you could still make info shareable, but it surely’s now not that easy.”

Like RPG IV, ILE CL is a must for interfacing with Java functions. aside from being an extra step alongside the highway to Java, ILE CL offers efficiency merits as well.

“When an RPG program executes an external name, efficiency intelligent, it’s not nearly as good with CL,” Wang says. “if you happen to stream CL to ILE and combine that CL module with the [ILE] RPG module to form a single program object, efficiency intelligent, it’ll be superior than anything else you had earlier than.”

[Editor’s Note: Part two of the Road to Java series, due to run in the Jan. 11, 1999 MIDRANGE Systems, will focus on making the transition to modular ILE application development.]


Developer members of the family withdrawal: IBM iSeries AS/four hundred laptop-based mostly practising curriculum from computerized practicing systems (ATS) | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Developer family members withdrawal: IBM iSeries AS/four hundred computing device-primarily based practicing curriculum from computerized practicing methods (ATS)IBM united states Withdrawal Announcement 905-218September 27, 2005

available codecs: ENUS905-218.PDF(9KB)

useful January 13, 2006, IBM will withdraw from marketing below the Developer advertising and marketing Partnerships-Remarketing utility program, the following selected computer-based practicing courses from program supplier computerized training systems, Inc. (ATS):

ProgramProgram name number edition

AS/four hundred(R) COBOL/four hundred(R) Programming 5620-BYE 1AS/four hundred Interactive COBOL Programming 5620-BYF 1AS/400 COBOL/400 Subfile Programming 5620-BYG 1AS/400 advanced COBOL Programming 5620-BYH 1AS/four hundred RPG/400(R) Programming 5620-BYI 1AS/400 Interactive RPG/four hundred Programming 5620-BYJ 1AS/four hundred RPG/four hundred Subfile Programming 5620-BYK 1AS/four hundred advanced RPG/four hundred Programming 5620-BYL 1AS/400 RPG IV Programming 5620-BYM 1AS/four hundred Database Administration I: 5620-BYU 1Data Description SpecificationsAS/400 Database Administration II: 5620-BYV 1Design and ImplementationAS/four hundred SQL/400(R) 5620-BYW 1AS/400 question for users 5620-BYX 1AS/400 query for advanced users 5620-BYY 1OfficeVision/400(TM) very own services 5620-BYZ 1OfficeVision/400 primary note Processing 5620-BZA 1OfficeVision/400 superior notice Processing 5620-BZB 1AS/four hundred Introduction: advanced sequence 5620-BZC 1AS/four hundred manage Language Programming 5620-BZD 1AS/four hundred CL and Programming concepts 5620-BZE 1AS/400 Work management 5620-BZF 1AS/400 application construction 5620-BZG 1AS/400 security 5620-BZH 1Client entry RUMBA/400 5620-BZI 1AS/four hundred web.facts(R) power 5620-BZJ 1AS/400 Java(TM) Introduction 5620-DAQ 1Client access for administrators 5620-DAR 1On or after January 13, 2006, that you may no longer order these items directly from IBM or an IBM approved Distributor.

This withdrawal applies to the IBM Developer marketing Partnership relationship best. different relationships between ATS and IBM, within the U.S. or global, are unaffected.

replacement product assistance: None

again to top

Reference suggestions

program capabilities don't follow.

confer with the utility license agreements (SLA) web web page for assistance on the application functions conclusion date

http://www.ibm.com/application/slaTrademarks

OfficeVision/400 is a trademark of overseas company Machines enterprise in the united states or different international locations or both.

AS/400, COBOL/400, RPG/four hundred, SQL/four hundred, and internet.statistics are registered trademarks of overseas company Machines supplier in the u.s. or different nations or both.

Java is a trademark of solar Microsystems, Inc.

different enterprise, product, and repair names may well be emblems or service marks of others.

connected Thomas trade replace Thomas For Industry

While it is very hard task to choose reliable certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people get ripoff due to choosing wrong service. Killexams.com make it sure to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. We never compromise on our review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client confidence is important to us. Specially we take care of killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If you see any false report posted by our competitors with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just keep in mind that there are always bad people damaging reputation of good services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our sample questions and sample brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-2]


LOT-952 exam questions | HP0-M15 practice test | HP0-144 free pdf | LX0-103 real questions | C2180-188 exam prep | 00M-602 pdf download | 000-633 test questions | HP0-069 questions answers | 190-712 examcollection | HP0-P25 braindumps | 270-551 study guide | 060-DSFA680 study guide | 190-835 practice questions | NSE4-5-4 free pdf download | NS0-140 braindumps | M2170-741 sample test | NS0-155 real questions | HAT-680 practice questions | HP0-D11 cram | VCS-322 practice test |


Ensure your success with this 000-267 question bank
killexams.com furnish latest and refreshed Practice Test with Actual test Questions and Answers for new syllabus of IBM 000-267 Exam. Practice our Real Questions and braindumps to Improve your insight and pass your exam with High Marks. We guarantee your achievement in the Test Center, covering every one of the points of exam and assemble your Knowledge of the 000-267 exam. Pass 4 beyond any doubt with our exact questions. Gigantic Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are given at http://killexams.com/tr

We have Tested and Approved 000-267 Exams. killexams.com gives the most unique and latest IT exam materials which practically comprise all braindumps. With the guide of our 000-267 exam materials, you do not need to spend big time on reference books and virtually need to burn through 10-20 hours to ace our 000-267 real questions and answers. Whats greater, we supply you with PDF Version and Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its presented to give the applicants mimic the IBM 000-267 exam in a real exam environment. killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all assessments on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $ninety nine
FEBSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
Click http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/000-267

Quality and Value for the 000-267 Exam: killexams.com Practice Exams for IBM 000-267 are composed to the most astounding norms of specialized exactness, utilizing just certified topic specialists and distributed creators for advancement.

100% Guarantee to Pass Your 000-267 Exam: If you don't pass the IBM 000-267 exam utilizing our killexams.com testing engine, we will give you a FULL REFUND of your obtaining charge.

Downloadable, Interactive 000-267 Testing engines: Our IBM 000-267 Preparation Material gives you all that you should take IBM 000-267 exam. Subtle elements are looked into and delivered by IBM Certification Experts always utilizing industry experience to create actual, and consistent.

- Comprehensive questions and answers about 000-267 exam - 000-267 exam questions joined by displays - Verified Answers by Experts and very nearly 100% right - 000-267 exam questions updated on general premise - 000-267 exam planning is in various decision questions (MCQs). - Tested by different circumstances previously distributing - Try free 000-267 exam demo before you choose to get it in killexams.com

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
FEBSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders


Snap http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/000-267

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-4]


Killexams BCP-223 pdf download | Killexams NS0-155 Practice test | Killexams 00M-235 practice questions | Killexams 1Z0-499 free pdf | Killexams 9A0-350 exam questions | Killexams M2020-615 study guide | Killexams CSWIP examcollection | Killexams 000-240 cheat sheets | Killexams C2040-923 practice test | Killexams 3M0-701 practice exam | Killexams 1Z0-434 Practice Test | Killexams 920-548 real questions | Killexams MB5-626 braindumps | Killexams 3I0-010 mock exam | Killexams HP0-J51 exam prep | Killexams S90-09A practice questions | Killexams EW0-200 free pdf | Killexams C2010-568 free pdf | Killexams A2040-985 dumps | Killexams FM0-302 braindumps |


[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-5]

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


Killexams HP2-Z04 braindumps | Killexams 132-S-911-3 free pdf | Killexams M9510-648 dump | Killexams 1Y0-A01 Practice Test | Killexams DP-002W sample test | Killexams 000-278 questions answers | Killexams NBDE-I real questions | Killexams 920-335 brain dumps | Killexams 090-600 examcollection | Killexams MTEL Practice test | Killexams 000-706 free pdf | Killexams 000-574 real questions | Killexams LOT-955 questions and answers | Killexams HP0-Y42 cheat sheets | Killexams C2090-610 test prep | Killexams HD0-400 mock exam | Killexams C9520-911 practice questions | Killexams ISSEP bootcamp | Killexams 000-014 cram | Killexams 000-315 braindumps |


AS/400 RPG IV Developer

Pass 4 sure 000-267 dumps | Killexams.com 000-267 real questions | [HOSTED-SITE]

Road to Java Goes Through RPG IV | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

Road to Java Goes Through RPG IV

[Editor’s Note: This article is part one of a three-part series on making the transition from RPG to Java in an AS/400 shop.]

You’re committed to the AS/400 and develop applications in RPG. It works fine for you, always has. But you’ve heard so much about Java being the future of AS/400 application development, if not the savior of the platform. In fact, nothing runs it better than the AS/400. So you want to see what Java can do for your green-screen RPG applications.

You’re not alone. At user conferences coast-to-coast, standing-room only crowds are packing conference rooms to find out just what Java is all about. But the transition from traditional RPG to Java doesn’t happen overnight. IBM has outlined five phases AS/400 shops should go through along the road to Java.

This article deals with Phase I – upgrading RPG III and CL to RPG IV and ILE CL.

Why upgrade to RPG IV? First of all, IBM is no longer investing in RPG III. For that matter, it only invests in RISC versions of RPG IV. Secondly, RPG IV, available since the V3R1 release of OS/400 four years ago, is a more modern application development environment.

“RPG IV is more modular,” says George Farr, VisualAge RPG and ILE RPG IV technical development manager. “You don’t have monolithic applications with lines and lines of code.”

Furthermore, RPG IV is ILE-enabled, meaning it can be integrated with applications written in other ILE (Integrated Language Environment) languages like C and COBOL . “You can mix RPG with other languages, it combines all the lines together,” says Farr. “You create something in RPG, C or COBOL and run it all from a single process.”

Farr says RPG IV has similarities to Java in language elements and syntax, though it doesn’t have any object-oriented features like encapsulation, polymorphism and inheritance. He explains that RPG IV has structured op codes that “compare directly” to loops and “if…select” functions in Java. Data types used by both languages are identical.

“If you move straight from RPG III to Java, the learning curve is a lot steeper,” he says. “If it’s 50 percent going from RPG IV to Java, it’s 80 percent going from RPG III to Java.” And even if you don’t intend to move from RPG to Java, you’ll still need to move to RPG IV to integrate Java into your system environment.

“If you’re going to have any interoperability between Java and RPG, have Java call RPG or RPG call Java, only RPG IV can provide that enablement,” Farr says.

“As we move forward, I really don’t think Java will ever replace RPG. RPG is here to stay. Even if we wanted to kill it, what on earth would we do with the millions of lines of RPG code that are out there? If you feel your existing applications don’t need Java, you can leave them the way they are. But you can enable Java to talk to RPG and RPG to talk to Java with RPG IV.”

The RPG tide is slowly turning toward RPG IV. Farr estimates that the percentage of RPG users on RPG IV was in the single digits in the first two years after RPG IV was released. He says it’s likely in the 40-50 percent range now.

“Once you move to RPG IV, you should invest in cleaning up your RPG code,” he says. “With RPG IV’s op codes, you can do things in a single line of code – like add a date/time stamp – that you would have to write lines of code for in RPG III. You move to RPG IV, you turn them into procedures.”

So transitioning to RPG IV won’t turn RPG developers into Java developers. But it’s an important first step. Farr cautions that the object-oriented nature of Java can be difficult to grasp for the RPG programmer.

“Java is an object-oriented language similar to C++. It’s not being pushed by companies but by the user community. Java is a very elegant language. It cleans up a lot of the mess of C++, with multiple inheritance, with pointers, with garbage collection. Java’s made it a lot faster to do object-oriented programming than C++. But any OO language is going to be hard to an RPG user.

“It’ll be easier to learn Java than C++. The language features will be easy to learn, but the OO features will be extremely hard. It may take people a couple of months just to learn what OO is all about.”

Farr says not every RPG programmer will need to learn Java. He suggests that most shops will be mixed RPG and Java. New hires will likely be the Java experts.

“I see Java as unavoidable especially with the Internet. Most companies will have to tune in to it at some point.” If you convert your RPG III applications to RPG IV, don’t leave your CL applications behind. They must be converted to ILE CL.

“If you have applications written in RPG III and you convert them to RPG IV, it’s not good enough if your CL is still in an OPM (original program module) environment,” says Jing Wang, senior software engineer at IBM’s Rochester, Minn. AS/400 development center. “RPG IV runs into a separate ILE action group. Sharing open files and commit control does not work that well with CL. You must migrate CL to ILE CL and make the whole application ILE.

“We’ve found out a lot of applications do share open files. Without moving to ILE CL, you can still make files shareable, but it’s not that smooth.”

Like RPG IV, ILE CL is a must for interfacing with Java applications. Aside from being another step along the road to Java, ILE CL offers performance benefits as well.

“When an RPG program executes an external call, performance wise, it’s not as good with CL,” Wang says. “When you move CL to ILE and combine that CL module with the [ILE] RPG module to form a single program object, performance wise, it’ll be better than anything you had before.”

[Editor’s Note: Part two of the Road to Java series, due to run in the Jan. 11, 1999 MIDRANGE Systems, will focus on making the transition to modular ILE application development.]


A first look at RPG: turns out it’s not only Role-Playing Games | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

Many of you have heard about one of the oldest programming languages, COBOL, and you have also heard that COBOL programmers are much asked for nowadays to maintain old legacy code. There’s another old-timer which few know about and which is still in use and will be in use for quite a while for applications in various specific fields (i.e. finance, banking, etc.). Its name is IBM RPG.

Once upon a time…

RPG is a high-level programming language for business applications. It is an IBM proprietary programming language and its later versions are available only on IBM i- or OS/400-based systems.

RPG has been around for more than half a century. By the end of the 1950s, IBM had built a huge number of electromechanical devices called tabulating machines. The last mass-produced tabulator model was the IBM 407 Accounting Machine:

Figure 1. IBM 407 at U.S. Army’s Redstone Arsenal, 1961

By the way, this tabulator rented from $800 to $920 per month ($8100 to $9300 per month in 2016 dollars), depending on the model. They were withdrawn from marketing on December 17, 1976.

As you know, scientific and technological progress was striding forward at the time, and the end of the 1950s saw the birth of the first transistor computers. The first IBM computer of this type was IBM 1401 built in 1959:

Figure 2. IBM 1401 at the Endicott History and Heritage Center

The Computer History Museum has one working unit. Take a look at how it all worked — that’s really interesting (I especially like the phrase “We need a little bit of cooling” at 4:41):

To facilitate ease of transition for their customers to the new transistor computers, IBM developed two tools in 1959 to replicate punched-card processing on computers: FARGO (Fourteen-o-one Automatic Report Generation Operation) and RPG (Report Program Generator). Both languages’ syntax resembled that of the instruction language of electromechanical tabulators. FARGO and RPG also replicated an important feature of tabulators: cyclic processing mode (known as the program cycle), in which tabulators read punched cards, summarized their contents, and printed a result. IBM still maintains backward compatibility with the program cycle even in the latest dialect, RPG IV.

Even though RPG was developed under much influence of FARGO, it took RPG just a few years to replace its predecessor as a more superior language. The next system to receive RPG support was mainframe IBM System/360 Model 20:

Figure 3. IBM System/360 Model 20 at the Deutsches Museum

A couple of years later (at the end of the 1960s), IBM released the next dialect, RPG II, for midrange computer System/3:

Figure 4. Midrange computer IBM System/3 Model 10 and the operator at work

RPG has since evolved into an HLL equivalent to COBOL and PL/I. Its distinctive feature (in contrast to modern languages) was the so called fixed-format syntax, so programs were difficult to read without a special debugging template.

An RPG program once typically started off with File Specifications, listing all files being written to, read from, or updated, followed by Data Definition Specificationscontaining program elements such as Data Structures and dimensional arrays, much like a “Working-Storage” section of a COBOL program or “var” statements in Pascal. A variable is defined with a fixed-format Definition Specification. In the Definition Specification, denoted by a letter D in column 6 of a source line, the data type character (see the table below) would be encoded in column 40. Also, if the data type character is omitted, that is, left blank, the default will be A if no decimal positions are specified. Otherwise, the default will be P.

Further the Calculation Specifications were given, which are the list of commands for execution. Output Specifications could also follow, they determined the layout of other files or reports.

The following is the description of all the specifications types:

  • The U or Auto Report spec is only required for Auto Report programs.
  • The H or Header spec is at the top of the program and describes compiler options such as maximum compile size, whether the program is an MRT (Multiple Requestor Terminal) program, and what type of listing is generated when the program is compiled. The object name of the program created is located in columns 75–80; if a source does not have an H spec, the name RPGOBJ is used.
  • The F or File spec(s) are next, and describes the files used in the program. Files may be disk files (DISK) or may be devices such as a printer (PRINTER), the workstation (WORKSTN), keyboard (KEYBORD), unformatted display (CRT or DISPLAY), or user-defined (SPECIAL). Record size, block size, overflow indicators, and external indicators are described. It is possible that an RPG program will not use any F specs.
  • The E or Extension spec(s) are next, and describe arrays and tables, which may be prefetched from disk files (an Input table), drawn from constants placed at the end of the source between ** and /* symbols, or built from calculations.
  • The L or Line Counter spec(s) are next, and if present, describe the form to be printed. It defines the number of lines in a page and the positions where printing begins and ends.
  • The I or Input specs are next, and describe the data areas within files. RPG II permits redefinition of data areas so that a field named FLDA might occupy the same area as an array AR that contains 8 elements of 1 character each. Non-record areas such as data structures can be described. Depending on the values of the input record, indicators may be conditioned.
  • The C or Calculation spec(s) are next. Total fields may be described and accumulated. Complex computations and string manipulations are possible. Indicators may be conditioned.
  • The last specification(s) are O or Output specifications, which describe the output record in terms of fields and output positions.
  • Now, here’s a small example for you to practice reading RPG programs (F and D specifications are omitted):

    * Asterisk (*) in column 7 defines a comment line * In column 6, you write a character denoting* the specification type to be used. The type of specification* defines what the source line does (i.e. definitions section,* calculations section, etc.).* "C" spec (calculation) describes calculations to be done.C HOURS IFLE 40C HOURS MULT RATE PAYC ELSEC RATE MULT 40 PAY 72C HOURS SUB 40 OTIME 30C RATE MULT 1.5 OTRATE 94C OTRATE MULT OTIME OTPAY 72C ADD OTPAY PAYC END

    This code looks complicated, doesn’t it? And that’s just a simple payroll tax calculation for an hourly employee (employees get time and a half for hour worked beyond the first 40).

    In 1978, IBM introduced midrange computer System/38 and a new RPG dialect, RPG III, for it:

    Figure 6. Midrange computer IBM System/38

    From that moment on, IBM was gradually abolishing the limitations of the language; programmers were allowed to write specifications in free form:

    /free If Hours <= 40; Pay = Hours * Rate; Else; Pay = (40 * Rate) + ((Hours — 40) * (Rate * 1.5)); EndIf; /end-free

    Finally, the last version, RPG IV (aka RPGLE, ILE RPG), was released in 1994. Its three prominent features are built-in functions, procedures, and free-form programming. Until November 2013, the free format applied exclusively to the calculation specifications. With the V7R1 TR7 upgrade to the language, the “/free” and “/end-free” calculations are no longer necessary, and the language has finally broken the ties to punched cards.

    I also recommend looking at this document where IBM demonstrates the drastic changes made to the language. RPG remains a popular programming language on the IBM i operating system, which runs on IBM Power i platform hardware:

    Figure 7. IBM Power i server series

    All in all, the RPG programming language has been used on 1401, /360, /3, /32, /34, /36, /38 AS/400 and System i systems. There have also been implementations for the Digital VAX, Sperry Univac BC/7, Univac system 80, Siemens BS2000, Burroughs B700, B1700, Hewlett Packard HP3000, ICL 2900 series, Honeywell 6220 and 2020, Four-Phase IV/70 and IV/90 series, Singer System 10 and WANG VS, as well as miscellaneous compilers and runtime environments for Unix-based systems, such as Infinite36 (formerly Unibol 36), and PCs (Baby/400, Lattice-RPG).

    Today, RPG IV is a more robust language. Editing can still be done via SEU, the simple green-screen editor:

    Figure 8. Green-screen editor

    However, a long progression of tools has been developed over time. Some of these have included Visual Age for RPG, which was developed by IBM and promoted by Jon Paris and others. Currently the preferred editing platform is IBM’s Websphere Development Studio client, now named RDi (Rational Developer for i), which is a customized implementation of Eclipse:

    Figure 9. Rational Developer for i

    There is also an RPG compiler for Microsoft .NET. This version contains extensions to RPG IV beyond that of the base IBM compiler. These extensions provide Microsoft Windows and .NET hooks in the Native and System 36 environment, as well as the ability to port DB/2 files to Microsoft Access and Microsoft SQL Server databases via ODBC.

    Conclusion

    Although RPG is quite an exotic language, it is a fact that there exists a large amount of code written in it in specific fields such as finance, banking, and the like. The language is quite diverse: it includes 4 dialects and supports both fixed- and free-form programming. The need to maintain old legacy code and write new code force companies to seek RPG developers, who seem to be on the Red List for threatened species. Given the circumstances, additional code-quality control tools such as static analyzers are much called for.

    You must have already guessed what the reason for writing this article is and what we are driving at. You’re right: we are now considering the idea of creating a static code analyzer for the RPG language. I believe such an analyzer would be a great aid to those who still maintain and develop RPG programs. But we haven’t come to a decision yet. Needless to say, it’s quite a specific niche.

    That’s why we need you to tell us if you want PVS-Studio analyzer to become a tool that could detect bugs in RPG programs. Dear potential users of PVS-Studio RPG, we are looking for you. Don’t hesitate to email us!


    Settling In With IBM i For The Long Haul | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    February 11, 2019 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    If nothing else, the IBM i platform has exhibited extraordinary longevity. One might even say legendary longevity, if you want to take its history all the way back to the System/3 minicomputer from 1969. This is the real starting point in the AS/400 family tree and this is when Big Blue, for very sound legal and technical and marketing reasons, decided to fork its products to address the unique needs of large enterprises (with the System/360 mainframe and its follow-ons) and small and medium businesses (starting with the System/3 and moving on through the System/34, System/32, System/38, and System/36 in the 1970s and early 1980s and passing through the AS/400, AS/400e, iSeries, System i, and then IBM i on Power Systems platforms.

    It has been a long run indeed, and many customers who have invested in the platform started way back then and there with the early versions of RPG and moved their applications forward and changed them as their businesses evolved and the depth and breadth of corporate computing changed, moving on up through RPG II, RPG III, RPG IV, ILE RPG, and now RPG free form. Being on this platform for even three decades makes you a relative newcomer.

    There is a longer run ahead, since we believe that the companies that are still running IBM i systems are the true diehards, the ones who have no intention of leaving the platform and that, at least according to the survey data we have been privy too, are intending to continue investing in, or even expand their investments in, the IBM i platform.

    Thus far, we are not in a recession and heaven willing there will not be one, so the priorities that IBM i shops have are not the ones that they had a decade ago during the height of the Great Recession. Back then, as was the case in just about all IT organizations, IBM i shops were hunkering down and were trying to cut costs in all ways possible, including deferring system upgrades and migrations as well as cutting back on other projects. Only 29 percent of the 750 IBM i shops that participated in the 2019 IBM i Marketplace Survey, which HelpSystems did back in October 2018, were concerned about reducing IT spending. This is a remarkably low level, and I think is indicative of how relatively strong the economy is – excepting some of the fits and starts we saw at the end of 2018 and here in early 2019 that make us nervous and could start putting pressure on things. Here are the top concerns as culled from the survey:

    Dealing with the growth in data and in figuring out the analytics to chew on that data ranked a little bit higher on the 2019 IBM i Marketplace Survey than did reducing costs, and I think over the long haul these issues will become more important than modernizing applications and dealing with the IBM i skills shortages that are a perennial worry. Both of these issues are being solved as new programmers and new tools to make new interfaces to database applications are becoming more common and as technologies such as free form RPG, which looks more like Java, Python, and PHP, are being more widely deployed and, importantly, can be picked up more quickly by programmers experienced with these other languages.

    Given the nature of the customer base, it seems unlikely to me that security and high availability will not continue to be primary concerns, despite the fact that the IBM i platform is among the most secure platforms on the planet (and not just because it is obscure, but because it is exceedingly difficult to hack) and it has a range of high availability and disaster recovery tools (from IBM, Syncsort, Maxava, and HelpSystems) available for those who want to double up their systems and protect their applications and data. The bar is often higher than simple backup and recovery for many IBM i shops in the banking, insurance, manufacturing, and distribution industries that dominate the platform. These companies can’t have security breaches, and they can’t have downtime.

    There is a remarkable amount of stability in the IBM i customer base that we think, at this point, is reflective in the stability of the IBM i platform and Big Blue’s own belief that it needs a healthy IBM i platform to have an overall healthy Power Systems business. We all know that the Power Systems hardware business has just turned in five quarters of revenue growth – something we discussed recently in developing our own revenue model for the Power Systems business – but what we did not know, and what you should know, is that in the second and third quarters of 2018, the IBM i portion of the business grew significantly faster than the overall Power Systems business, and the only reason that this did not happen in the final quarter of 2018 is that sales of IBM i machinery in Q4 2017 was quite strong and represented a very tough compare. The point is, the IBM i business has been raising the Power Systems class average. (These hints about the IBM i business come compliments of Steve Sibley, vice president and offering manager of Cognitive Systems at IBM.)

    IBM’s own financial stability of the Power platform – which has been bolstered by a move into Linux clusters for analytics and high performance computing simulation and modeling as well as by the adoption of the HANA in-memory database by SAP customers on big iron machines including Power8 and now Power9 systems – helps IBM i customers feel more confident in investing in the current IBM i platform. The recent evidence from several different surveys, not just the one done by HelpSystems every year, suggests that companies are by and large either continuing to invest in the platform or even in some cases are planning to increase their spending on the IBM i platform in 2019.

    As you can see, the pattern of investment plans for the IBM i platform, as shown in the chart above, has not changed very much at all in the past four years. It is a remarkably stable pattern with but a little wiggling here and there that may not even be statistically significant. Just under a quarter of IBM i shops have reported in the past four years that they plan to increase their investment in the platform in each year, and just under half say that they are holding steady. This does not mean that the same companies, year after year, are investing more and other companies are staying pat, year after year. It is far more likely that every handful of years – more like four or five – customers upgrade their systems and expand their capacity, and they then sit tight. The wonder is that the split isn’t showing far fewer companies investing and far more sitting tight. That more than a tenth of the shops don’t know what their plan is as each prior year comes to a close is a bit disturbing, but it is honest and shows that a significant portion of shops have other priorities aside from hardware and operating system upgrades. We have said this before and we will say it again: We think that the people who respond to surveys and read weekly publications focused on the IBM i platform are the most active shops – the ones more likely to stay relatively current on hardware and software. So the pace of adoption for new technologies, and the rate of investment, should be higher than in the actual base, much of which does not change much at all.

    So if we had to adjust this data to take on the whole base, there might be far fewer sites that are investing more money, far more companies that are sitting tight, and maybe fewer sites that are contemplating moving off the IBM i platform. I think the distribution of data is probably something like 10 percent of shops have no idea what they are doing investment wise with IBM this year, 5 percent are thinking about moving some or all of their applications to another platform, maybe 10 percent are investing more this year, and the remaining 75 percent are sitting tight. This is just a guess, of course. As far as we can tell, the rate of attrition – how many sites we actually lose each year – just a tad over 1 percent. So the rate of movement of applications off the platform, or incidences of unplugging IBM i databases and applications, may not be anywhere near as high in the overall base as the data above suggests. What is alarming, perhaps, is that the rate of moving some or all applications off the platform is balanced against those who say they will increase investments. Perhaps these are hopeful survey takers, and those who think it is easy to move find it is not and those who think they will find the money to invest will not.

    What we do know is that if the rate of application attrition was anywhere near as high as these surveys suggest, then the IBM i business would not be growing, but shrinking. And we know it is not shrinking, so we think there is a disconnect between planning and reality, both on the upside and the downside.

    If you drill down into the data for the 2019 IBM i Marketplace Survey, there were 13 percent of shops that said they would be moving some applications to a new platform, and another 9 percent that said they were going to move all of their applications off IBM i. (This number is consistent with the recent ALL400s survey done by John Rockwell.)

    Anyway, good luck with that.

    Porting applications from one platform to another, of buying a new suite on that new platform, is an exceedingly difficult task. It is not like trying to change a tire while driving down the road, as is a common metaphor, but rather like trying to take the tire off one car moving down the highway and installing it on another car driving beside it in the adjacent lane without crashing either car or smashing into anyone else on the road. Optimism abounds, but when push comes to shove, very few companies try such a maneuver, and when they do, it is usually because there is a corporate mandate, more times than not caused by a merger or acquisition, that pits some other platform against IBM i running on Power Systems. Companies that say they are making such a move off IBM i are sanguine for their own personal reasons, perhaps, but they are not necessarily realistic about how long it might take, what disruption it will cost, and what ultimate benefit, if any, will be realized.

    If you do the math on the chart above, eight-tenths of the base has no idea how long a move will take, another 1.7 percent thinks it will take more than five years, and 3 percent say it will take between two years and five years. Only 3.4 percent of the total base say they can do it in under two years. We think all of these numbers are optimistic, and the companies who could easily leave OS/400 and IBM i already did a long time ago and those that are remain have a harder time, not an easier time, moving. If this were not true, the IBM i base would be a hell of a lot smaller than the 120,000 customers we think are out there, based on what Big Blue has told us in the past. This is the difference between fear or pressure or culture and the reality of trying to move a business off one platform and onto another. These moves are always a lot harder than they seem on the front end, and we suspect many of the benefits also don’t materialize for those who do jump platforms.

    At the average attrition rate suggested by this survey data – 9 percent move off the platform in somewhere between one year and more than five years, with most companies not being able to see more than five years into the future that is a neat trick – the installed base would shrink dramatically. It is tough to say how far because of the wide range of timeframes in the survey. If it was 9 percent of the base within two years – call it 4.5 percent of the base per year – then within a decade the overall base would shrink from 120,000 IBM i sites worldwide down to about 72,000. This would dramatic indeed. But at a 1 percent attrition rate per year, the base is still at 107,500 unique customers (not sites and not installed machines, both of which are larger) by 2029. We think there is every chance that the attrition rate will actually slow and drop underneath 1 percent as IBM demonstrates commitment to the Power Systems platform and its IBM i operating system. There are always some new customers being added in new markets, to be sure, but the bleed rate (even if it is small) is still probably an order of magnitude larger than the feed rate.

    When they do think about making the move, IBM i shops know exactly where they want to go, and this answer has been gradually changing over the years: Linux as an alternative to IBM i is on the rise and Windows Server as an alternative is on the wane. In the latest survey, 52 percent of the companies that said they were moving all or some of their applications to another platform said they were choosing Windows Server, while 34 percent chose Linux. This reflects the relative popularity of Windows Server and Linux in the datacenters of the world at large, and may be tipped just a little more heavily towards Linux compared to the rest of the world. Interestingly, 10 percent of those polled who said they were moving were looking at AIX platforms, and another 4 percent were going upscale to System z mainframes – as unlikely as this may seem. Platforms tend to roll downhill; they do not usually defy gravity like that.

    The thing about such surveys is that they show intent, not action. We often intend to do a lot more than we actually can accomplish, and moving platforms after spending decades of building up expertise is not usually a very smart move unless the platform is in real trouble – like the Itanium systems from Hewlett Packard Enterprise running OpenVMS or HP-UX or the HP 3000s running MPE or the Sparc systems from Oracle running Solaris. These were once great platforms with huge installed bases and tremendous revenue streams, but now, IBM is the last of these Unix and proprietary platforms with its Power Systems line. And it is by far the biggest and for sure the only one showing any growth.

    RELATED STORIES

    The IBM i Base Did Indeed Move On Up

    The IBM i Base Is Ready To Move On Up

    Investment And Integration Indicators For IBM i

    Security Still Dominates IBM i Discussion, HelpSystems’ 2018 Survey Reveals

    The IBM i Base Not As Jumpy As It Has Been

    The Feeds And Speeds Of The IBM i Base

    IBM i Priorities For 2017: Pivot To Defense

    IBM i Trends, Concerns, And Observations

    IBM i Survey Gets Better As Numbers Grow

    Where Do Those IBM i Machines Work?

    Finding IBM i: A Game Of 40 Questions

    It Is Time To Tell Us What You Are Up To

    IBM i Marketplace Survey: The Importance Of Being Earnest

    What’s Up In The IBM i Marketplace?

    IBM i Marketplace Survey Fills In The Blanks



    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11970467
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12907270
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/12/ibm-000-267-dumps-and-practice-tests.html
    Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2ob
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/9x362kb5fzyepupuqepvxzouxe0577s3






    Back to Main Page

    Close 100% Pass Guarantee or Your Money Back

    How to Claim the Refund / Exchange?

    In case of failure your money is fully secure by BrainDumps Guarantee Policy. Before claiming the guarantee all downloaded products must be deleted and all copies of BrainDumps Products must be destroyed.


    Under What Conditions I can Claim the Guarantee?

    Full Refund is valid for any BrainDumps Testing Engine Purchase where user fails the corresponding exam within 30 days from the date of purchase of Exam. Product Exchange is valid for customers who claim guarantee within 90 days from date of purchase. Customer can contact BrainDumps to claim this guarantee and get full refund at Software Testing. Exam failures that occur before the purchasing date are not qualified for claiming guarantee. The refund request should be submitted within 7 days after exam failure.


    The money-back-guarantee is not applicable on following cases:

    1. Failure within 7 days after the purchase date. BrainDumps highly recommends the candidates a study time of 7 days to prepare for the exam with BrainDumps study material, any failures cases within 7 days of purchase are rejected because in-sufficient study of BrainDumps materials.
    2. Wrong purchase. BrainDumps will not entertain any claims once the incorrect product is Downloaded and Installed.
    3. Free exam. (No matter failed or wrong choice)
    4. Expired order(s). (Out of 90 days from the purchase date)
    5. Retired exam. (For customers who use our current product to attend the exam which is already retired).
    6. Audio Exams, Hard Copies and Labs Preparations are not covered by Guarantee and no claim can be made against them.
    7. Products that are given for free.
    8. Different names. (Candidate's name is different from payer's name).
    9. The refund option is not valid for Bundles and guarantee can thus not be claimed on Bundle purchases.
    10. Guarantee Policy is not applicable to Admission Tests / Courses, CISSP, EMC, HP, Microsoft, PMI, SAP and SSCP exams as killexams.com provides only the practice questions for these.
    11. Outdated Exam Products.
    CloseSearch
    Spring Campaign! Get 25% Discount on All Exams!

    This is a ONE TIME OFFER. You will never see this Again

    Instant Discount
    Braindumps Testing Engine

    25% OFF

    Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 25% OFF Discount Code Plus... Our Exclusive Weekly Deals

    A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login.


    * We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.
    CloseSearch
    Your 25% Discount on Your Purchase

    Save 25%. Today on all IT exams. Instant Download

    Braindumps Testing Engine

    Use the following Discount Code during the checkout and get 25% discount on all your purchases:

    BRAINDUMPS25

    Start ShoppingSearch